The Self-Reporting Fallacy · Paper V · The Procedural Gap Project

Dispute Engine

Enter a dispute. Get the worst-case narrative, escalation paths, and the cost of the assignment decision — before it's too late to change it.

Based on Paper V — On Legal Bullshit: Frankfurt's Distinction and the Self-Reporting Fallacy in Litigation · The Procedural Gap Project ↗

Case Profile

Case Type

Current Claim Amount €

Months Elapsed

Current Stage

Case Description — what happened, who is involved, what went wrong

— or paste text below —

Please describe the case — at least 30 characters.

Assigned Professional & Firm

This professional represents — which party is this lawyer or expert acting for?

Assigned Professional Profile — name, specialisation, seniority level, track record

— or paste text below —

Please describe the assigned professional.

Firm / Organisation Profile — advertised expertise, size, reputation

— or paste text below —

Please describe the firm.

Comparison Engine: This is where the value is. Enter the best available alternative at the same firm, or leave blank and the AI will generate the ideal specialist profile for this case. The delta between the two paths is the cost of the assignment decision.

Alternative Profile (optional — leave blank to auto-generate ideal specialist)

Best Available Alternative — the person who should have been assigned

— or paste text below —

Analysing escalation paths…

Scoring competence gap (SDD)

Mapping escalation paths

Calculating actor incentives

Building comparison delta

Generating narrative

Case History — click any snapshot to review

Stress Test Verdict

—

Overall Filing Integrity / 100

—

Dominant Exposure Analysis

Document Quality Scores

Ideal Response — Chinese Wall (Generated Independently)

—

Ideal vs Actual — Gap Analysis

Dimension	Ideal Approach	What Was Filed	Gap

Language Signals Detected

Evidence Audit — Requested vs Provided

Implied by Claim

Actually Provided

Conspicuously Absent

—

SDD Filing Interpretation

—

Liability Signals

War Game Scenarios

Defense Assertion Truth Test — Phase 8

PI Liability Switch Detection

Own-Client Negligence — Filing Firm vs Its Own Client

⚡ Multi-Party Cascade — PI Insurer Faces Both Sides

Foreseeable Economic Exposure

—

if this dispute continues unmitigated

Settlement Window

—

Competence Comparison — SDD Analysis

Assigned Professional

—

SDD Gap

—

pts

Alternative / Ideal

—

Escalation Decision Tree — All Paths to Terminal

Most Probable Outcome

—

Path Compression — Options Narrowing Over Time

—

Actor Incentive Analysis — Who Gains From Delay?

Actor	Path A Cost	Path B Cost	Path C Cost	Likely Choice	Reasoning

Predictive Narrative

What Will Probably Happen

—

What Would Have Happened — With the Alternative

—

Responsibility Migration

—

Case Update

Submit New Evidence

Add court filings, correspondence, expert reports, or describe what has happened since the last analysis. The AI will update all paths, probabilities, and scores — and explicitly state what it missed before.

Months Elapsed (now)

Current Claim Amount €

Current Stage

Filed By — Which party submitted this document?

New Evidence / What Happened — court orders, correspondence, new developments

— or describe below —

Assigned Professional Changed? (optional — leave blank if same)